RE: Minutes at London
"McIntyre, Lloyd" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.fax |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Tamura-san, Thank you for your efforts in crafting these minutes. I have only one suggestion for enhancement of section 5.5 below. Lloyd >---------------------------------------------------------------------- >5.5 TIFF-FX extension issue >---------------------------------------------------------------------- >- draft-ietf-fax-tiff-fx-Extension-1-02.txt > (drtyre-tiff-fx-extension1-02.txt) >- darft-mcintyre-feature-schema-extension1-00.txt > >After remembering that all the issues in these documents are related >to the previous discussion about TIFF and TIFF-FX issue, and that IPR >problems should be clearly investigated also for these proposed extensions, >the presentation described the further JBIG2 extensions. > >Toward the end of the Schema extension presentation, a member ask how many >had read the draft, there was no clarifications as which draft was being >referenced. He suggested the lack of interest could lead to a lack of >implementations. > >There was acknowledgement from a member who had reviewed the Schema drat. >The requestor then asked whether the work should be continued, >without much response. I believe that the 2nd and 3rd paragraphs should be combined in a manner where the 3rd paragraph is inserted between the 1st and 2nd sentence of the 2nd paragraph. A couple of small typographical errors may also be addressed. The result would be as follows: Toward the end of the Schema extension presentation, a member ask how many had read the draft, there was no clarifications as to which draft was being referenced. There was acknowledgement from a member who had reviewed the Schema draft. The requestor then asked whether the work should be continued, without much response. He suggested the lack of interest could lead to a lack of implementations. > >A member commented that the extension of resolution is important for >implementers. Because RFC2301 only support up to 400x400dpi. > >No conclusions were made. > -----Original Message----- > From: Hiroshi Tamura [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2001 3:19 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Minutes at London > > > Folks, > > Sorry for the delay. Attached is the draft minutes at London. > > It is difficult to satisfy all of you. > Some people support one thing, but others may oppose it. > I hope all of you accept it as much as possible. > > But, if there are **fatal mistakes**, please let me know soon. > We have to submit it within **this week**. > > Anyway, thanks again, Graham and Claudio. > > BTW, Regarding TIFF-FX issue, the description here is old. > As you already know, there are already other options. > > Regards, > -- > Hiroshi Tamura, Co-chair of IETF-FAX WG > E-mail: [email protected] > >