RE: Minutes at London

> >5.5 TIFF-FX extension issue

> >After remembering that all the issues in these documents are related
> >to the previous discussion about TIFF and TIFF-FX issue, and that IPR
> >problems should be clearly investigated also for these proposed extensions,
> >the presentation described the further JBIG2 extensions. 
> > 
> >Toward the end of the Schema extension presentation, a member ask how many
> >had read the draft, there was no clarifications as which draft was being
> >referenced. He suggested the lack of interest could lead to a lack of
> >implementations.
> >
> >There was acknowledgement from a member who had reviewed the Schema drat.
> >The requestor then asked whether the work should be continued,
> >without much response. 
> I believe that the 2nd and 3rd paragraphs should be combined in a manner
> where the 3rd paragraph is inserted between the 1st and 2nd sentence of the
> 2nd paragraph. A couple of small typographical errors may also be addressed.
> The result would be as follows:
> 
> Toward the end of the Schema extension presentation, a member ask how many
> had read the draft, there was no clarifications as to which draft was being
> referenced. There was acknowledgement from a member who had reviewed the
> Schema draft. The requestor then asked whether the work should be continued,
> without much response. He suggested the lack of interest could lead to a
> lack of implementations.

It's ok for me. Thanks.

--
Hiroshi Tamura, Ricoh Company, LTD.
E-mail: [email protected]