option 5 for TIFF-FX

Hiroshi Tamura <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.fax
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Folks,

I'm very sorry for my slow action.
I have been very busy these days. I hope you understand my situation.
This month, I can find more time for our group. But, my response
may be slow. Thanks for your patience.

I do not follow every mails in September, but, anyway,
we have to decide for TIFF-FX.

As you already know, there are lots for favors for option 5.
Therefore, the conlusion is "option 5"

  5. Full TIFF-FX with 2 Content-types - retain the currently defined
  TIFF-FX draft without modification of the encoding set and use two
  MIME content-types within the SINGLE specification. It restricts
  the use of the existing image/tiff MIME type and .tif (or .tiff)
  file name extensions to profiles S and F, and assign a new MIME type and
  file name extension for the profiles J, C, L, and M (perhaps image/tifx and
  .tfx (or .tifx)). It's a variant of options 1 and 4.

We know there are pros and cons for option 5.
I hope everyone accept it. Also I would like everyone to help it go forward.

But, as already indicated, it might take more time to complete all work.
We need the schedule.

I think TIFF-FX editors and the people who support it should provide
somthing at first. Please do it.

--
Hiroshi Tamura, Co-chair of IETF-FAX WG
E-mail: [email protected]
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.