Re: option 5 for TIFF-FX

Claudio Allocchio <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.fax
Message-ID <Pine.VMS.3.91-B.1011003094228.56772A-100000@SYNX02.elettra.trieste.it>

> I'm very sorry for my slow action.

Yes, we both had a very busy period.

> As you already know, there are lots for favors for option 5.
> Therefore, the conlusion is "option 5"

I'm currently making a summary of the list reactions, and apparently the 
consensus is in fact on the following:

>   5. Full TIFF-FX with 2 Content-types - retain the currently defined
>   TIFF-FX draft without modification of the encoding set and use two
>   MIME content-types within the SINGLE specification. It restricts
>   the use of the existing image/tiff MIME type and .tif (or .tiff)
>   file name extensions to profiles S and F, and assign a new MIME type and
>   file name extension for the profiles J, C, L, and M (perhaps image/tifx and
>   .tfx (or .tifx)). It's a variant of options 1 and 4.

Thus, I can issue the classical sentence:

  Speak now, or keep quiet forever!

regards,
Claudio Allocchio
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.