Re: option 5 for TIFF-FX
Claudio Allocchio <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.fax |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <Pine.VMS.3.91-B.1011003094228.56772A-100000@SYNX02.elettra.trieste.it> |
> I'm very sorry for my slow action. Yes, we both had a very busy period. > As you already know, there are lots for favors for option 5. > Therefore, the conlusion is "option 5" I'm currently making a summary of the list reactions, and apparently the consensus is in fact on the following: > 5. Full TIFF-FX with 2 Content-types - retain the currently defined > TIFF-FX draft without modification of the encoding set and use two > MIME content-types within the SINGLE specification. It restricts > the use of the existing image/tiff MIME type and .tif (or .tiff) > file name extensions to profiles S and F, and assign a new MIME type and > file name extension for the profiles J, C, L, and M (perhaps image/tifx and > .tfx (or .tifx)). It's a variant of options 1 and 4. Thus, I can issue the classical sentence: Speak now, or keep quiet forever! regards, Claudio Allocchio