Re: option 5 for TIFF-FX

Folks,

> As you already know, there are lots for favors for option 5.
> Therefore, the conlusion is "option 5"

<snip>

> I think TIFF-FX editors and the people who support it should provide
> somthing at first. Please do it.

No mails so far. I comment it.

At first, we need new two or more I-Ds.
- Revised tiff-fx document
- New or Revised registration document for image/tiff or/and
new MIME type.
At least, those documents should be available prior to December IETF meeting.
The sooner, the better.

Next, implementation tests.
According to the I-Ds or revised I-Ds after getting some consensus
at the meeting or in our ML, the tests should be done.
New MIME type tests must be included.
It may be better to include the test for Profile S and F
with the use of image/tiff.
At the earliest, they will be done in January or February, I think.

After that, the final I-Ds will be availble.

License issues should be clarified in parallel.

Again,
TIFF-FX editors and the people who support it should comment for it.

Regards,
--
Hiroshi Tamura, Co-chair of IETF-FAX WG
E-mail: [email protected]