Re: Internet FAX WG meeting summary

>>Claudio Allocchio wrote:
>> CA asked ALL the editors of current drafts to carefully check their 
>> documents (and the member of the WG to helpo them cross-checking, too) 
>> for places where image/tiff and image/tiff-fx split might be involved, 
>> and provide the needed corrections and updates ASAP. Again the procedures 
>> for the Implementers guide (i.e. the quickiest possible path) will be 
>> taken also for these other docments. NF confirms that the IESG will 
>> define the exact procedure to be folowed.
>
>I will check them. 
>

draft-ietf-fax-service-v2-05:
 It refers RFC2301 "File Format for Internet Fax" and RFC 2302
"Tag Image File Format (TIFF)-- image/TIFF: MIME Sub-type Registration".

The part which refers two RFCs is below.
 2.2.3     Content

   The data format of the facsimile image is based on the minimum set of
   TIFF for Facsimile [5], also known as the S profile.   Such facsimile
   data are included in a MIME object by use of the image/TIFF sub-type
   [12].  Additional rules for the use of TIFF for Facsimile, for the
   message-based Internet facsimile application, are defined later.

I think we don't need to change description above if the two references are 
draft-ietf-fax-tiff-fx-11 and draft-ietf-fax-tiff-regbis-03.
Of course, we should change the RFC number when draft-ietf-fax-tiff-fx-11 
and draft-ietf-fax-tiff-regbis-03 become draft standard. 

DRAFT-IETF-FAX-ESMTP-CONNEG-01:
It dose not refer either references. 

Regards,

Kiyoshi Toyoda