RE: No description for image/tiff in Impl-Guide
"McIntyre, Lloyd" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.fax |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Dan and Tamura-san, Please excuse my delayed response below, I am on vacation. Regards, Lloyd > -----Original Message----- > From: Hiroshi Tamura [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2001 2:46 PM > To: [email protected] > Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; > [email protected] > Subject: RE: No description for image/tiff in Impl-Guide > > > Dan, > > Thanks for your comment. > > > > Also, "image/tiff-fx" may be used for Profile S and F. > > > > > > BTW, is the last sentence true, or would image/tiff always be used > > > for S and F? Yes, the above is true. One could perceive a future where viewers of more efficient encodings become dominant and use the need to use two MIME content-types becomes unnecessary. > > > > If you you're only sending Profile S or F, I don't see a > need to "scare" > > a receiver into thinking you're sending a higher-complexity TIFF. > > > > So, I would recommend striking the last sentence above and > replacing it > > with: > > > > To achieve the highest amount of interworking with devices only > > capable of rendering Profile S or F, "image/tiff-fx" SHOULD NOT > > be used for Profile S or F; rather, "image/tiff" SHOULD be used. I do not support striking the last sentence. It may, however, be reasonable to add a note that captures the intent without conveying a message that it is never appropriate to use image/tiff-fx. To maximize interworking with devices that are only capable of rendering Profile S or F, "image/tiff" SHOULD be used when transporting Profile S or F. > > I do not have my strong opinion about it. > As I quoted, draft tiff-fx-11 says image/tiff-fx may be used > for S or F. > So, at first, I included it. > > But, This is the **Guide** for Ifax. For implementers, it may better. > OK. I agree to it. > > > Note that in IETF standards language, implementations can ignore > > "SHOULD" requirements if they desire. > > Right. > > Regards, > -- > Hiroshi Tamura, Ricoh Company, LTD. > E-mail: [email protected] >