RE: No description for image/tiff in Impl-Guide

"McIntyre, Lloyd" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.fax
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Dan and Tamura-san,
Please excuse my delayed response below, I am on vacation.

Regards,
Lloyd

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Hiroshi Tamura [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2001 2:46 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
> [email protected]
> Subject: RE: No description for image/tiff in Impl-Guide
> 
> 
> Dan,
> 
> Thanks for your comment.
> 
> > >   Also, "image/tiff-fx" may be used for Profile S and F.
> > >
> > > BTW, is the last sentence true, or would image/tiff always be used
> > > for S and F?
Yes, the above is true.
One could perceive a future where viewers of more efficient encodings become
dominant and use the need to use two MIME content-types becomes unnecessary.
> > 
> > If you you're only sending Profile S or F, I don't see a 
> need to "scare"
> > a receiver into thinking you're sending a higher-complexity TIFF.
> > 
> > So, I would recommend striking the last sentence above and 
> replacing it
> > with:
> > 
> >   To achieve the highest amount of interworking with devices only
> >   capable of rendering Profile S or F, "image/tiff-fx" SHOULD NOT
> >   be used for Profile S or F; rather, "image/tiff" SHOULD be used.
I do not support striking the last sentence.
It may, however, be reasonable to add a note that captures the intent
without conveying a message that it is never appropriate to use
image/tiff-fx.

    To maximize interworking with devices that are only capable of 
    rendering Profile S or F, "image/tiff" SHOULD be used when
    transporting Profile S or F.
> 
> I do not have my strong opinion about it.
> As I quoted, draft tiff-fx-11 says image/tiff-fx may be used 
> for S or F.
> So, at first, I included it.
> 
> But, This is the **Guide** for Ifax. For implementers, it may better.
> OK. I agree to it.
> 
> > Note that in IETF standards language, implementations can ignore
> > "SHOULD" requirements if they desire.
> 
> Right.
> 
> Regards,
> --
> Hiroshi Tamura, Ricoh Company, LTD.
> E-mail: [email protected]
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.