FAX WG status

Folks,

We have a few remaing things to do. I comment them below,
according to the order of the SLC minutes.
I was not at the SLC meeting. So, if there are mistakes
or something, please let us know.
Also, any comments are appreciated.

1 Service (draft-ietf-fax-service-v2-05.txt)

We already have done for WG Last Call and IESG request.
There are few differences from the previous version.
Not technical, just trivial things.
No action is necessary. Only reference issue.

2 Content Negotiation (draft-ietf-fax-content-negotiation-05.txt)

The IETF last call finished. It is in RFC-editors' queue.
No action is necessary.

3 Timely Delivery (draft-ietf-fax-timely-delivery-05.txt)

The WG last call finished.
Claudio or I will request IETF last call to the IESG.

4 Fax Gateway (draft-ietf-fax-gateway-protocol-06.txt)
              (draft-ietf-fax-gateway-options-04.txt)

The WG last call finished. Last year I requested IETF last call.
It is in Ned's queue. After his review, we may do action.

5 FFPIM (draft-ietf-fax-ffpim-01.txt)

After Dave submits the new version, we can do WG last call.
The content has no problems, I think. We wait fot it.

6 ESMTP-CONNEG (draft-ietf-fax-esmtp-conneg-01.txt)

There was modification from the previous version. But, according to -01,
there seems to be no problems. If you agree to it, we can do WG last call.
Claudio or I will do it soon. 

7 Terminal mode issue (draft-maeda-faxwg-terminal-mode-goals-01.txt)
                      (draft-maeda-faxwg-terminal-mode-protocol-01.txt)
                      (draft-maeda-faxwg-fax-processing-status-01.txt)

We agree to the dropping from our milestone. This is the final notice.
If anything, please say it. Unless there are lots of support,
we should drop them.

8 TIFF-FX extension (draft-ietf-fax-tiff-fx-extension-1-01.txt)
                    (darft-mcintyre-feature-schema-extension1-00.txt)

Until the TIFF-FX itself is solved, there is no action.

9 Addressing issue (draft-allocchio-gstn-01.txt)

Claudio will submit the new version. We wait for it.

10 ITU-T

In the next month, the meeting is held. I will prepare the letter,
according to the result of SLC meeting.

11 TIFF-FX (draft-ietf-fax-tiff-fx-11.txt)

The difference is the description about the use of two content-types:
image/tiff and image/tiff-fx. There are no problems.
We should do WG Last Call as recycle ***Proposed Standard*** at first,
according to the result of the SLC meeting.

Claudio and Lloyd, Am I right?

12 TIFF registration (draft-ietf-fax-tiff-regbis-04.txt)

It is corrected for Magic Number issue. We can do WG last call as BCP.
Claudio or I will do it soon. 

13 TIFF-FX registration (draft-ietf-fax-tiff-fx-reg-01.txt)

It seems that there are no problems. We can do WG last call as BCP.
Claudio or I will do it soon. 
Also, the interoperability test will be necessary for Draft Standard.

14 Impl. Guide (draft-ietf-fax-implementers-guide.08.txt)

The content-type issue is reflected in it. The IETF Last Call is finished.
But, there is only one reference issue on draft-ietf-fax-tiff-fx-reg-01.txt.
So, I think the two I-D should be published at the same time,,,.
Is it true?

.........

BTW, Minneapolis meeting is coming. I think it is better
to have our meeting for the status confirmation,
although there are few things to discuss.

Claudio, what do you think about it?

I have been very busy these days. Please do not expect my early response.

Regards,
--
Hiroshi Tamura, Ricoh Company, LTD.
E-mail: [email protected]