RE: FAX WG status
Hiroshi Tamura <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.fax |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Lloyd, > > 11 TIFF-FX (draft-ietf-fax-tiff-fx-11.txt) > > > > The difference is the description about the use of two content-types: > > image/tiff and image/tiff-fx. There are no problems. > > We should do WG Last Call as recycle ***Proposed Standard*** at first, > > according to the result of the SLC meeting. > This is not correct. > Ned, our AD, has accepted an action to obtain IESG clarification as to > whether it is necessary to recycle TIFF-FX to Proposed Standard. A case may > be made that it is NOT necessary to recycle to Proposed Standard (i.e. > retain in current state of pending Last Call for Draft Standard) since there > were no file format features (i.e. encoding features) added to TIFF-FX. OK. Thanks for your clarification. > Ned - what is the status with regard to IESG evaluation of the case? > It is essential that we obtain IESG clarification very soon, given the > January milestone for WG Last Call towards Proposed Standard and March > milestone for approval of Proposed Standard, which is essential if a > September milestone for approval of Draft Standard is to be realized. Ned, we need your comment. Please do. > > 13 TIFF-FX registration (draft-ietf-fax-tiff-fx-reg-01.txt) > > > > It seems that there are no problems. We can do WG last call as BCP. > > Claudio or I will do it soon. > > Also, the interoperability test will be necessary for Draft Standard. > This is basically correct, however, the last call should be for Proposed > Standard. WG Last Call should be issued very soon, given the mid-January > milestone. Oh, copy and paste error. In a few days, We will do for Proposed Standard. > > BTW, Minneapolis meeting is coming. I think it is better > > to have our meeting for the status confirmation, > > although there are few things to discuss. > Given the milestones below, I believe there will be a lot to discuss with > regard to TIFF-FX and image/tiff-fx registration progression to Draft > Standard. OK. I request our meeting slot sooner or later. -- Hiroshi Tamura, Ricoh Company, LTD. E-mail: [email protected]