RE: FAX WG status

Hiroshi Tamura <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.fax
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Lloyd,

> > 11 TIFF-FX (draft-ietf-fax-tiff-fx-11.txt)
> > 
> > The difference is the description about the use of two content-types:
> > image/tiff and image/tiff-fx. There are no problems.
> > We should do WG Last Call as recycle ***Proposed Standard*** at first,
> > according to the result of the SLC meeting.

> This is not correct. 
> Ned, our AD, has accepted an action to obtain IESG clarification as to
> whether it is necessary to recycle TIFF-FX to Proposed Standard. A case may
> be made that it is NOT necessary to recycle to Proposed Standard (i.e.
> retain in current state of pending Last Call for Draft Standard) since there
> were no file format features (i.e. encoding features) added to TIFF-FX.

OK. Thanks for your clarification.

> Ned - what is the status with regard to IESG evaluation of the case? 
>       It is essential that we obtain IESG clarification very soon, given the
> January milestone for WG Last Call towards Proposed Standard and March
> milestone for approval of Proposed Standard, which is essential if a
> September milestone for approval of Draft Standard is to be realized.

Ned, we need your comment. Please do.

> > 13 TIFF-FX registration (draft-ietf-fax-tiff-fx-reg-01.txt)
> > 
> > It seems that there are no problems. We can do WG last call as BCP.
> > Claudio or I will do it soon. 
> > Also, the interoperability test will be necessary for Draft Standard.
> This is basically correct, however, the last call should be for Proposed
> Standard. WG Last Call should be issued very soon, given the mid-January
> milestone.

Oh, copy and paste error. In a few days, We will do for Proposed Standard.

> > BTW, Minneapolis meeting is coming. I think it is better
> > to have our meeting for the status confirmation,
> > although there are few things to discuss.

> Given the milestones below, I believe there will be a lot to discuss with
> regard to TIFF-FX and image/tiff-fx registration progression to Draft
> Standard.

OK. I request our meeting slot sooner or later.

--
Hiroshi Tamura, Ricoh Company, LTD.
E-mail: [email protected]
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.