RE: No description for image/tiff in Impl-Guide

Tom,

> As I understand it the 'Implementers Guide for Facsimile Using Internet
> Mail' <draft-ietf-fax-implementers-guide-07.txt> was approved by the IESG
> for publication as an Informational RFC on November 15, 2001.  So are we
> talking about an update of that document, i.e., another RFC that would
> Obsolete the first one?  Or if the Editor's queue is long, perhaps the
> updated document will be approved by the IESG for publication before the
> first one is assigned an RFC number?

This is the peculiar process, if my understanding is right.
The exception. Though I was not at our SLC meeting, our group agreed to
check all the related RFCs and I-Ds for TIFF-FX at the meeting.

In the meantime, we agreed in ML that the use of image/tiff and image/tiff-fx
should be written in the guide.

Anyway, it will be assigned an RFC number along with the tiff-fx-reg I-D
under WG last call.

--
Hiroshi Tamura, Ricoh Company, LTD.
E-mail: [email protected]