RE: ID-ACTIONs on UM

ID-ACTIONs on UMI have long thought (c) would be best.  I think the
application area directors would also prefer (c), as it reduces the number
of working groups.

-d
  -----Original Message-----
  From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]On
Behalf Of Glenn Parsons
  Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2002 8:34 AM
  To: [email protected]
  Cc: IETF VPIM List; [email protected]
  Subject: ID-ACTIONs on UM


  Folks,

  These drafts discuss some general unified messaging (UM) client issues
that I think would be worth discussing at both the FAX and VPIM WGs.

  After some discussion, I suggest we need to decide between the following:
  a) create a new BOF/WG to work on UM
  b) recharter VPIM and/or FAX to work on this
  c) close and combine VPIM and FAX into a new UM WG to work on this and
remaining VPIM/FAX topics

  Cheers,
  Glenn Parsons
  VPIM WG Chair

    <<[VPIM] I-D ACTION:draft-vaudreuil-um-issues-00.txt>> <<[VPIM] I-D
ACTION:draft-burger-um-reqts-00.txt>>