RE: ffpim revised draft
Graham Klyne <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.fax |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
At 08:08 PM 3/18/02 -0800, Dan Wing wrote: >Is there really an expectation that TIMELY will be implemented when >DSN hasn't been implemented in all these years? I mean to say, why >does 3.0 require support of TIMELY, but doesn't require support >of NOTARY (DSN)? The TIMELY spec actually requires support for DSN (and more). (But it may help to be more explicit.) #g ------------------- Graham Klyne <[email protected]>