RE: spell checked minutes

Lloyd,

Thanks for your comment.

> Please excuse my late comments, as I was out of the office.

Not so late, in fact.
I will write our formal minutes, from now on,
based on Claudio's minutes. I will add something, from the slides
and comments in this ML after the meeting.
Sorry for my slow action. I was very busy with my private things these days.

I will circulate the draft formal minutes within a few days.

> The status of 
> - draft-ietf-fax-service-v2-05.txt
> 
> 4th paragraph, last sentence
> "It is thus strongly suggested to the editors
> and the WG to make any possible additional effort to clarify these points,
> eventually providing some new interoperability testing, within a clear
> framework."
> should be truncated at the comma (,) to read
>  
> "It is thus strongly suggested to the editors
> and the WG to make any possible additional effort to clarify these points."
> 
> It is my understanding that Ned did NOT require new TIFF-FX interoperability
> testing. I believe his instructions were more consistent with taking
> whatever actions necessary to insure satisfaction of the interoperability
> requirements.

You're right. I think Ned did not require it IN THE MEETING.
In the formal minutes, I modify as the above.

But, there were mail discussion about the necessity of the new testing
among Ned, Claudio and me after the meeting. Next week, I comment it.
Please wait.

--
Hiroshi Tamura, Co-chair of IETF-FAX WG
E-mail: [email protected]