RE: TIFF-FX format re-testing is necessary

Hiroshi Tamura <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.fax
Message-ID <[email protected]>
> Since there will be new interoperability testing, could those
> doing the testing please save some of the test messages/files?
> It would be useful for others who might want to test
> interoperability later; it can also validate the range
> of options tested.

It would be useful, but, I do not think it is necessary
in implementation reports.
It would be like including all the protocol header or format.

> There are some differences between RFC 2301 and
> draft-ietf-fax-tiff-fx-11.txt. Will the tests cover
> the areas of difference (e.g., use of the optional
> GlobalParametersIFD in profiles S and F)?

There are slight differences. But, I do not think there are 
not large difference technically, regarding the file format,
as I roughly see the revision.

To the Editors:
If it is not correct, please comment.

Anyway, the format of the implementation report will be
similar to the previous one that we already have in IETF site.


--
Hiroshi Tamura, Co-chair of IETF-FAX WG
E-mail: [email protected]
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.