RE: TIFF-FX format re-testing is necessary
Hiroshi Tamura <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.fax |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> Since there will be new interoperability testing, could those > doing the testing please save some of the test messages/files? > It would be useful for others who might want to test > interoperability later; it can also validate the range > of options tested. It would be useful, but, I do not think it is necessary in implementation reports. It would be like including all the protocol header or format. > There are some differences between RFC 2301 and > draft-ietf-fax-tiff-fx-11.txt. Will the tests cover > the areas of difference (e.g., use of the optional > GlobalParametersIFD in profiles S and F)? There are slight differences. But, I do not think there are not large difference technically, regarding the file format, as I roughly see the revision. To the Editors: If it is not correct, please comment. Anyway, the format of the implementation report will be similar to the previous one that we already have in IETF site. -- Hiroshi Tamura, Co-chair of IETF-FAX WG E-mail: [email protected]