RE: TIFF-FX format re-testing is necessary

It would be appeciated if the TIFF files used in constructing a further
implememtation report could be referenced along with the report so that
those who may subsequently wish to replicate their own tests are able to do
so. Thank you.

John


At 11:20 15/04/02 +0900, Hiroshi Tamura wrote:
>
>> Since there will be new interoperability testing, could those
>> doing the testing please save some of the test messages/files?
>> It would be useful for others who might want to test
>> interoperability later; it can also validate the range
>> of options tested.
>
>It would be useful, but, I do not think it is necessary
>in implementation reports.
>It would be like including all the protocol header or format.
>
>> There are some differences between RFC 2301 and
>> draft-ietf-fax-tiff-fx-11.txt. Will the tests cover
>> the areas of difference (e.g., use of the optional
>> GlobalParametersIFD in profiles S and F)?
>
>There are slight differences. But, I do not think there are 
>not large difference technically, regarding the file format,
>as I roughly see the revision.
>
>To the Editors:
>If it is not correct, please comment.
>
>Anyway, the format of the implementation report will be
>similar to the previous one that we already have in IETF site.
>
>
>--
>Hiroshi Tamura, Co-chair of IETF-FAX WG
>E-mail: [email protected]
>
>