Re: Last Call: SMTP Service Extension for Content Negotiation to Proposed Standard

On Tue, 02 Jul 2002 18:45:32 PDT, Dave Crocker said:

> >            however if pursuing this path it would still be necessary to
> >            leave room for VOICENEG or MIMENEG or whatever,
> 
> If you would supply some sort of functional description for these, it might 
> be possible to understand how the current specifications fails to satisfy 
> them.  I have no idea what you are intending, and therefore cannot even 
> guess at the deficiencies you are implying.

I think that's Keith's POINT - that this has gotten to "Last Call" and there's
no understanding on the part of the supporters what the "voice" or "mime"
communities want, or whether this can/should be extended to address their
concerns as well.
-- 
				Valdis Kletnieks
				Computer Systems Senior Engineer
				Virginia Tech

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001

iD8DBQE9InWgcC3lWbTT17ARAuMmAJ0Q9SX00ROO0GJx3YmyzfkPtTP9GQCfRKVw
o7KXQgfm4JusjaJRREEo/p0=
=KI/C
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----