Re: Last Call: SMTP Service Extension for Content Negotiation to Proposed Standard
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.fax |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Thu, 04 Jul 2002 01:26:50 EDT, John C Klensin said: > That is a reasonable position. But I suggest that it implies > either that this material should go to Experimental, rather than > Proposed, or that the mechanism should be defined as applicable Would this address the concerns of everybody? -- Valdis Kletnieks Computer Systems Senior Engineer Virginia Tech
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 226 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001 iD8DBQE9I+y8cC3lWbTT17ARAhiqAKDlNGQw7EsXG2w2m5pi9DAiF2cSZgCdEMaw qFdH0NL8l9+fZVMpCRzGxMw= =9UF1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----