Re: Last Call: SMTP Service Extension for Content Negotiation to Proposed Standard

Dave Crocker <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.fax
Message-ID <[email protected]>
At 05:38 PM 7/7/2002 -0400, Keith Moore wrote:
>I do not share your opinion that someone who is interested in a particular 
>technology has an obligation to follow every WG that might try to alter 
>that technology.  First of all, it's not obvious which groups might do 
>this-for instance who would guess that

an internet draft filename that contains the string "esmtp" is a pretty 
good clue.

and remember that i-d's are announced, including their abstracts.  the 
abstract for the current specification is pretty straightforward.

d/

ps.  to the extent that you perceive a larger, IETF-wide coordination 
issue, i suspect you will get agreement from many people.  the hard part is 
in proposing a solution that those people will also agree with.


----------
Dave Crocker  <mailto:[email protected]>
Brandenburg InternetWorking  <http://www.brandenburg.com>
tel +1.408.246.8253;  fax +1.408.850.1850
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.