Re: [VPIM] Re: IETF-FAX WG Draft agenda at Yokohama

Dave Crocker <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.fax
Message-ID <[email protected]>
At 01:32 PM 7/8/2002 +0900, Hiroshi Tamura wrote:
>6 SMTP Service Extension for Content Negotiation  (30 min)
>- draft-ietf-fax-esmtp-conneg-02.txt
>- http://www.brandenburg.com/specifications/draft-ietf-fax-esmtp-conneg-03.txt
>
>7 FFPIM  (5 min)
>- draft-ietf-fax-ffpim-01.txt

The latest version of esmtp-conneg has removed all normative references to 
fax.  This change is intended to make the specification be appropriate for 
general email use.

Toyoda-san and I suggest that the requirement for conforming to 
fax-oriented use of esmtp-conneg, such as with citations to:

      [RFC2305] Toyoda, K., Ohno, H., Murai, J. and  D. Wing,
                "A Simple Mode of Facsimile Using Internet Mail",
                RFC 2305, March 1998.
and
      [RFC2534] Masinter, L., Holtman, K., Mutz, A. and D. Wing, "
                Media Features for Display, Print, and Fax",
                RFC 2534, March 1999.

be added to FFPIM.

How do folks feel about this?

d/

----------
Dave Crocker  <mailto:[email protected]>
Brandenburg InternetWorking  <http://www.brandenburg.com>
tel +1.408.246.8253;  fax +1.408.850.1850
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.