Re: short notes from the FAX meeting

At 11:10 AM 7/22/2002 +0100, Graham Klyne wrote:
>At 11:01 AM 7/22/02 +0200, Claudio Allocchio wrote:
>>  - FPIM conformance require RFC2305 and RFC2532 conformance?
>>
>>as there was no clear opinion of those presents, there questions are now
>>taken to the mailing list for final decsion.
>
>My recollection was that Dave (the editor) suggested RFC2305/2532 
>compliance would be required, and that there was no dissent.


That is Dave's recollection, also.

(To be specific:  I considered this requirement to be obviously necessary 
-- it is difficult to imagine how the new specification would operate, 
without conformance to its predecessors -- and so I presented this as a 
"default yes" choice.  This was intended to resolve this issue efficiently.

Hence, the position was that we would make this change, unless someone 
objected.  I do not recall hearing anyone object.

As but a lowly document editor, obviously I do not decide the decision 
process, and most certainly defer to the wise insight of the working group 
chairs on this matter...

d/


----------
Dave Crocker  <mailto:[email protected]>
Brandenburg InternetWorking  <http://www.brandenburg.com>
tel +1.408.246.8253;  fax +1.408.850.1850