Re: short notes from the FAX meeting

> That is Dave's recollection, also.
> 
> (To be specific:  I considered this requirement to be obviously necessary 
> -- it is difficult to imagine how the new specification would operate, 
> without conformance to its predecessors -- and so I presented this as a 
> "default yes" choice.  This was intended to resolve this issue efficiently.
> 
> Hence, the position was that we would make this change, unless someone 
> objected.  I do not recall hearing anyone object.

True ! ... but I just followed the rule "the decisions are taken to the 
mailing list anyhow"

:-)

... yes I'm a nasty burocrat!

:-)

Notes are there to be corrected and amended, is it?

thanks Dave!

Claudio

PS: other comments? addenda?