RE: Protocol Action: A Simple Mode of Facsimile Using Internet Ma il to Draft Standard

Lloyd,

> How is it possible for this advancement to Draft Standard when there are two
> 2.2.3 stated dependent references, TIFF for Facsimile (a.k.a TIFF-FX) and
> image/TIFF sub-type, which have not been advanced to Draft Standard?
> Additionally, there is a third dependent reference (not listed in 2.2.3),
> image/TIFF-FX sub-type, which has not been advanced to Draft Standard.

> > The IESG has approved the Internet-Draft 'A Simple Mode of Facsimile 
> > Using Internet Mail' <draft-ietf-fax-service-v2-05.txt> as a Draft 
> > Standard. This document obsoletes RFC2305.

As the above says, IESG has approved it.
And, it goes into RFC-Editor queue. (http://www.rfc-editor.org/queue.html)

We know there is a reference issue for Draft Standard.
Until two TIFF documents move to new status,
it remains in the queue. This is our understanding.

Also, service-v2 mentions Profile S,
therefore, it is not necessary to refer image/TIFF-FX sub-type.

Regards,
--
Hiroshi Tamura, Co-chair of IETF-FAX WG
[email protected]