Re: Working Group Dispute: disagreement with Working Group recommendation

Hiroshi,


Wednesday, November 6, 2002, 3:33:05 PM, you wrote:
>> I suggest setting time on the FAX WG agenda to discuss the
>> "interoperability" report and what the FAX WG will do:

>>  In cases in which one or more options or features
>>  have not been demonstrated in at least two interoperable
>>  implementations, the specification may advance to the
>>  Draft Standard level only if those options or features
>>  are removed.

Hiroshi> OK, irrespective of our results, I include it our agenda.

May I suggest that someone be prepared to make a presentation that responds
to the implied concern that Larry raising?

That is, they should document that EACH and EVERY option or feature has
"been demonstrated in at least two interoperable implementations". Or else
to document which options have NOT been so demonstrated and, therefore,
should be removed from the spec.

d/
-- 
 Dave Crocker  <mailto:[email protected]>
 TribalWise <http://www.tribalwise.com>
 t +1.408.246.8253; f +1.408.850.1850