Re: TIFF-FX: technical changes since RFC 2301

> Presumably there is a good reason to have tiff-fx contain this redundant
> capability.  So, presumably, there are times when it IS a good thing to use?
> 
> When is that?  And can we make the recommendation be clear about the
> circumstance in which -fx use of the redundant profiles is discouraged,
> versus when it is ok?

Hmm.
As we already have "image/tiff-fx", basically, the implementers must use it.
It became formal last September. As we expect easily,
every implementers do not follow the latest information.
It takes much time.

Any other opinions?

Regards,
--
Hiroshi Tamura, Ricoh Company, LTD.
E-mail: [email protected]