Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-fax-esmtp-conneg-06.txt
Hiroshi Tamura <[email protected]> Fri, 28 Feb 2003 11:28:02 +0900 (JST)
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.fax |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Larry, > > > S: 250-CONNEG (&(type=image/tiff) > > > S: 250-CONNEG (image-file-structure=TIFF-minimal) > > > S: 250-CONNEG (MRC-mode=0) > > > > I cannot see "type" feature tag in RFC2879. > > Could you tell us where it is defined, if you know? > > Or, can we use it, even if it is not defined? > > The 'type' feature is defined in RFC 2913 "MIME Content Types > in Media Feature Expressions", G. Klyne, September 2000. Thanks. I've found it. > > > because there is some possibility of using image/tiff > > > or image/tiff-fx, or at least it is not clear which is mandated by > the > > > other parameters. > > > > Yes. But is it really necessary information > > in capability description for sender side? > > It is different from necessary features such as > > file-structure, density and paper-size. > > > > This is just an example here. > > It is up to the editors to include, I think. > > This is just in the example. It is useful to show how > content negotiation can be used with multiple MIME types. > As Graham pointed out, it is useful also in 'converted-' > headers to show, for example, if an image message was > converted from some other MIME type. Yes. I do not stick to it so much. The editors will consider it. Anyway, thanks. Regards, -- Hiroshi Tamura