Re: draft-ietf-fax-esmtp-conneg-08.txt
Pete Resnick <[email protected]> Wed, 16 Jul 2003 13:24:09 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.smtp,gmane.ietf.fax |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <p06001b00bb3ae5ee54a0@[81.160.98.150]> |
On 7/15/03 at 2:43 PM +0900, Hiroshi Tamura wrote: >I asked your comments as below, but nothing. >Please comment NOW if there are things to suggest/discuss about the document. >If not, FAX WG will request the IESG consideration again, sooner or later. Why is the CONPERM command necessary? Isn't putting Content-Convert parts in a message implicit permission to do such transformations? Or is CONPERM really just signalling the server to go look inside the message? Other than that, it looks like an OK document to me. pr -- Pete Resnick <mailto:[email protected]> QUALCOMM Incorporated - Direct phone: (858)651-4478, Fax: (858)651-1102