RE: IETF Last Call Results for FAX WG Documents
"Scott Hollenbeck" <[email protected]> Tue, 29 Jun 2004 07:33:12 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.fax |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <5BEA6CDB196A4241B8BE129D309AA4AF02E0F64F@vsvapostal8.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com> |
Thank you, Toyoda-san. I will check the updates and bring the document to the IESG for review once it's available in the I-D archives. -Scott- > -----Original Message----- > From: Toyoda, Kiyoshi [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Sunday, June 27, 2004 10:33 PM > To: Hollenbeck, Scott > Cc: '[email protected]' > Subject: Re: IETF Last Call Results for FAX WG Documents > > > > Hollenbeck-san, > Claudio-san, Tamura-san > > Hollenbeck, Scott wrote: > > > >The IETF last call for these documents: > > > >draft-ietf-fax-esmtp-conneg-09.txt > >draft-ietf-fax-ffpim-04.txt > >draft-ietf-fax-faxservice-enum-02.txt > > > >has concluded. The only comments received were those I > provided and some > >provided by IANA. They can be found in the I-D tracker, but > I will repeat > >them here for the benefit of the WG. Please note that all > three documents > >will need to be updated before I will ask the IESG to review them: > > I revised "draft-ietf-fax-faxservice-enum-02.txt" according to > your comments. I have submitted > "draft-ietf-fax-faxservice-enum-03.txt" > as I-D. > > > > >draft-ietf-fax-faxservice-enum-02.txt: > >- There's a reference to [KEYWORDS] on the first page, but > no such reference > >exists. Please add a reference to RFC 2119. if that's the > reference being > >described. > > I added RFC 2119. > > > > >- The line lengths get a little long in section 3 (I-D nit, > "No text beyond > >the 72nd column of a line"). > > I corrected. > > > > >- In section 4, please change the example to use one of the > example domain > >names cited in RFC 2606 instead of "ifax.com". example.com perhaps? > > I changed the example as you said. > > > > >- Please split references into normative and informative > subsections in > >section 6 (I-D nit). You can leave informative out if all > references are > >normative. > > I added normative subsections. There is no informative reference. > > > > >- Update the [ENUMbis] reference to point to RFC 3761. > > I updated it. > > > > >- Remove the reference for [FFPIM]. I don't see it used > anywhere in the > >document. > > I added [FFPIM] in the paragraph below. > > accordance with "Simple Mode of Facsimile using Internet > Mail" [RFC2305] or "Extended Facsimile using Internet > Mail" [RFC2532]. "Full Mode Fax Profile for Internet Mail" [FFPIM] > is applied when it is approved as an Internet standards-track > specification. > > And, I leave it in the reference section as below. > > [FFPIM] Crocker, D., G. Klyne, "Full-mode Fax Profile for > Internet Mail", DRAFT-IETF-FAX-FFPIM-04(work in progress), > June 2004 > > > Best Regards, > > Kiyoshi Toyoda > >