RE: IETF Last Call Results for FAX WG Documents

"Scott Hollenbeck" <[email protected]> Tue, 29 Jun 2004 07:33:12 -0400
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.fax
Message-ID <5BEA6CDB196A4241B8BE129D309AA4AF02E0F64F@vsvapostal8.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com>
Thank you, Toyoda-san.  I will check the updates and bring the document to
the IESG for review once it's available in the I-D archives.

-Scott-

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Toyoda, Kiyoshi [mailto:[email protected]] 
> Sent: Sunday, June 27, 2004 10:33 PM
> To: Hollenbeck, Scott
> Cc: '[email protected]'
> Subject: Re: IETF Last Call Results for FAX WG Documents
> 
> 
> 
> Hollenbeck-san,
> Claudio-san, Tamura-san
> 
> Hollenbeck, Scott wrote:
> >
> >The IETF last call for these documents:
> >
> >draft-ietf-fax-esmtp-conneg-09.txt
> >draft-ietf-fax-ffpim-04.txt
> >draft-ietf-fax-faxservice-enum-02.txt
> >
> >has concluded.  The only comments received were those I 
> provided and some
> >provided by IANA.  They can be found in the I-D tracker, but 
> I will repeat
> >them here for the benefit of the WG.  Please note that all 
> three documents
> >will need to be updated before I will ask the IESG to review them:
> 
> I revised "draft-ietf-fax-faxservice-enum-02.txt" according to 
> your comments. I have submitted 
> "draft-ietf-fax-faxservice-enum-03.txt"
> as I-D.
> 
> >
> >draft-ietf-fax-faxservice-enum-02.txt:
> >- There's a reference to [KEYWORDS] on the first page, but 
> no such reference
> >exists.  Please add a reference to RFC 2119. if that's the 
> reference being
> >described.
> 
> I added RFC 2119.
> 
> >
> >- The line lengths get a little long in section 3 (I-D nit, 
> "No text beyond
> >the 72nd column of a line").
> 
> I corrected.
> 
> >
> >- In section 4, please change the example to use one of the 
> example domain
> >names cited in RFC 2606 instead of "ifax.com".  example.com perhaps?
> 
> I changed the example as you said.
> 
> >
> >- Please split references into normative and informative 
> subsections in
> >section 6 (I-D nit).  You can leave informative out if all 
> references are
> >normative.
> 
> I added normative subsections. There is no informative reference.
> 
> >
> >- Update the [ENUMbis] reference to point to RFC 3761.
> 
> I updated it.
> 
> >
> >- Remove the reference for [FFPIM].  I don't see it used 
> anywhere in the
> >document.
> 
> I added [FFPIM] in the paragraph below.  
> 
>     accordance with "Simple Mode of Facsimile using Internet 
>     Mail" [RFC2305] or "Extended Facsimile using Internet 
>     Mail" [RFC2532]. "Full Mode Fax Profile for Internet Mail" [FFPIM]
>     is applied when it is approved as an Internet standards-track 
>     specification.
> 
> And, I leave it in the reference section as below.
> 
>      [FFPIM] Crocker, D., G. Klyne, "Full-mode Fax Profile for 
>      Internet Mail", DRAFT-IETF-FAX-FFPIM-04(work in progress), 
>      June 2004
> 
> 
> Best Regards,
> 
> Kiyoshi Toyoda
> 
>