Re: LC MIB draft
Robert Haas <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.forces |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Thanks, I've put these small changes in the upcoming -05 version. I'll release it if there are no more comments. Regards, -Robert tom.petch wrote: > Apologies for the belated response. Yes, I have read it and like the changes. > > I would suggest a minor wording change in the DESCRIPTIONs to make them > consistent. > > forcesAssociationTimeUp is defined as > "The value of sysUpTime at the time this association entered the UP state." > which I like. > > Several others use the phrase > "on this association since it is up." > which for me does not read so well. I suggest changing these to > "on this association since the assocation entered the UP state. > > Not worth a re-issue IMO but worth changing as it goes forward. > > Tom Petch > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Patrick Droz" <[email protected]> > To: <[email protected]> > Sent: Monday, July 31, 2006 2:10 PM > Subject: LC MIB draft > > >> the LC of the MIB draft ended last Friday (July 28th, 2006). >> Feedback that was provided during the LC period has been >> incorporated and a new version has been released last Friday. >> As there is a new release of the draft (see below) I would >> like to extend the LC until Friday, August 4th, 2006 that >> people have the change to look at the new version. >> >> Regards, >> Patrick >> >> > > > -- Dr. Robert R. Haas IBM Zurich Research Laboratory Säumerstrasse 4 CH-8803 Rüschlikon/Switzerland phone +41-44-724-8698 fax +41-44-724-8578 http://www.zurich.ibm.com/~rha