Re: question on get the whole FE object LFB?
Jia Fenggen <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.forces |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Yes,I suppose if possible we should make it clear in the protocol draft to ensure implementation interoperability. Yours,Fenggen >From: "Joel M. Halpern" <[email protected]> >Reply-To: "Joel M. Halpern" <[email protected]> >To: [email protected] >Subject: Re: question on get the whole FE object LFB? >Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 09:18:32 -0400 > >I would agree that our wording is not as clear as it could be. > >Capabilities are attributes. They are intrinsically ready-only, but >they are attributes. >If the CE issues a get on the entire LFB, then the capabilities >should be returned as well. > >Yours, >Joel M. Halpern > >At 12:45 AM 9/22/2006, Jia Fenggen wrote: >>Still,there is a question,when CE requesting a whole LFB,should the >>capabilities also be returned back just like attributes or just the >>attributes,the draft doesn't say this? >>Yours,Fenggen _________________________________________________________________ 璐逛杞 MSN Explorer: http://explorer.msn.com/lccn