Re: model drasft

I would like to second Patrick's decision to move old authors of the
Model draft to a different and add new authors...this should have been
done long back since the old authors have been missing in action for a
very long time.

Hopefully this will get new energy to complete the Model draft.

I do not have any cycles to contribute to the Model draft at this time,
however I will review the draft once its out for LC as I had promised.

Thanks to Joel for continuing with his hard work on this draft for a
very long time,

Hormuzd

-----Original Message-----
From: Forwarding and Control Element Separation
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Guo,xiaoyi
Sent: Wednesday, September 27, 2006 10:04 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [FORCES] model drasft

Hi, Patrick,

I think we all glad to do some contrubition to model draft, it now slow
down
other drafts' progress. But first we should listen more people 's
comments
 if we want to move some authors to " ackonwledge ".

How about you think , Joel and other authors ?

Regards,
Xiaoyi

2006/9/27, Patrick Droz <[email protected]>:
> I would like to make a suggestion concerning the progress of the
> model draft. Apart from Joel nobody in the authors list has been
> active and we already have the max number of authors reached. So
> I would suggest we put the non active authors into an acknowledgment
> section as "Authors emeritus". This would open up room to find
> new active editors willing to work on the draft. Would there be
> new people willing to work on the model?
>
> Regards,
> Patrick
>
>
>