Re: Model: Configured Neighbor Table

"Guo,xiaoyi" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.forces
Message-ID <[email protected]>
OK, I think you are right. If we consider other types of interface, the media
address not neccesary.

Thanks,
Xiaoyi

2006/9/29, Joel M. Halpern <[email protected]>:
> Given that this table is just so that the CE can determine that the
> FEs are neighbors, and over which interfaces, I don't think the media
> address adds any value.  If it matches what is configured on the
> other device, then it is redundant.  And if it does not match, then
> the CE has no idea what to do with it.
>
> Remember that for this table the other end has to be an FE under the
> control of the same CE.
>
> Yours,
> Joel
>
> At 10:31 PM 9/28/2006, Guo,xiaoyi wrote:
> >Hi, Joel I remember that we suggest remove it from this section. But
> >if we want to keep it, I think we should add Address part. (If
> >neighbor interface part can't include it ) So it looks four field.
> >neighbor FE ID Interface to neighbor Neighbor Interface Neighbor
> >address (but I don't like to divide it into network or mac) Regards Xiaoyi
>
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.