Re: Model: Configured Neighbor Table
"Guo,xiaoyi" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.forces |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
OK, I think you are right. If we consider other types of interface, the media address not neccesary. Thanks, Xiaoyi 2006/9/29, Joel M. Halpern <[email protected]>: > Given that this table is just so that the CE can determine that the > FEs are neighbors, and over which interfaces, I don't think the media > address adds any value. If it matches what is configured on the > other device, then it is redundant. And if it does not match, then > the CE has no idea what to do with it. > > Remember that for this table the other end has to be an FE under the > control of the same CE. > > Yours, > Joel > > At 10:31 PM 9/28/2006, Guo,xiaoyi wrote: > >Hi, Joel I remember that we suggest remove it from this section. But > >if we want to keep it, I think we should add Address part. (If > >neighbor interface part can't include it ) So it looks four field. > >neighbor FE ID Interface to neighbor Neighbor Interface Neighbor > >address (but I don't like to divide it into network or mac) Regards Xiaoyi > >