Re: [Suggestion]model naming convention

On Mon, 2006-16-10 at 20:50 +0800, Jia Fenggen wrote:
> In the current model,an LFB is written without an clearly naming 
> conventions,the LFB name and element name are always begin with uppercase 
> an all kinds of  datatypedefs also begin with uppercase,should we define an 
> naming convention to formal the naming of various names.

I think this would help for consistency.

> I suggest 
> following:
> 1 All data types defined using datatypedef by user should have a name begin 
> with uppercase character,inside an complex data types,each element name 
> should begin with lowercase character;
> 2 The attributes capabilities and events element names of should begin with 
> lowercase character.  
> an general rule is that if the element is to be referenced by others,it 
> should begin with uppercase characters,else lowercase is used.An i suppose 
> the user don't directly use the simple types,he should define it's own 
> types before use them.
> that maybe not complete,what do you think?

So what happens when i have averylongnamehere? 
I hate hungarian naming notation, so anything else would be fine.
Generally i think the proposal to have formal rules is a good one.

cheers,
jamal