matching attribute and capability was Re: LC model draft draft-ietf-forces-model-07.txt

I am unclear from the I-D whether or not there is any formal matching of a
<capability> with an <attribute>, given they will often come in 'matched pairs'.

Say a port group has an attribute giving a maximum of two ports while the
capability is one.  The <capability> has a <name> and elementID, the <attribute
has a <name> and elementID; is there any relationship between the two pairs of
data?

Related to this, is the namespace of elementID for <capability> the same as or
distinct from the namespace of elementID for <attribute>?.


Tom Petch


----- Original Message -----
From: "Patrick Droz" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, October 13, 2006 10:36 AM
Subject: LC model draft draft-ietf-forces-model-07.txt


> I would like to issue last call on the model draft. As this is
> a fairly large document the LC will last for 3 weeks and will
> therefore end just before the next IETF. It is draft:
> draft-ietf-forces-model-07.txt
> and can be found at:
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-forces-model-07.txt
>
> A number of people have indicated that if the document is in
> LC they would thoroughly review the document. I hope people will
> stick to their promises.
>
> Regards,
> Patrick
>
>
>