Re: textual matters Re: LC model draft draft-ietf-forces-model-07.txt

Quite a number of very useful editorial matters.

You note one terminology problem that I am not sure how to correctly resolve.
We have LFB Attributes, and LFB Capabilities (which are really a 
special kind of attribute.)
That, by itself, as you observe, is a bad use of terminology.
You also note that this conflicts with the XML usage of "attribute."
Further, what they both are actually is LFB elements, not LFB attributes.
Can I just change the basic definition to "element"?  They are not 
exactly XML elements.  But they are conceptually similar to 
that?  (we assign them "elementID"s for example.
Or do we need to find yet another word for them?

Thanks,
Joel