XML basics Re: LC model draft draft-ietf-forces-model-07.txt
"tom.petch" <[email protected]> Fri, 27 Oct 2006 18:30:41 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.forces |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <021b01c6f9e5$c092a1e0$0601a8c0@pc6> |
Thinking some more about not understanding what is permitted with keys (and prompted by reading another XML data model I-D), I would like to see more about the usage of XML. This I-D dives straight into ForCES technology and explains that at length, but lacks much in the way of what XML is and is not permitted. Keys are one example. Another is the question I raised earlier about Schema ; there is a Schema but is it the Schema? (most XML I know has several with consequent namespace issues). Basic data types is another; I saw a statemant in another I-D that there are 44 in XML Schema which left me wondering about the list in -model. Schema versioning? much about LFB Class versioning but Schema have versions too. Namespaces, the use of elementID, NMTOKEN ... I have a sense of unspoken assumptions about which bits of XML will be used, which not, and would like more explicitness. Which is all I can produce by way of last call comments for the moment. Tom Petch ----- Original Message ----- From: "Patrick Droz" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, October 13, 2006 10:36 AM Subject: LC model draft draft-ietf-forces-model-07.txt > I would like to issue last call on the model draft. As this is > a fairly large document the LC will last for 3 weeks and will > therefore end just before the next IETF. It is draft: > draft-ietf-forces-model-07.txt > and can be found at: > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-forces-model-07.txt > > A number of people have indicated that if the document is in > LC they would thoroughly review the document. I hope people will > stick to their promises. > > Regards, > Patrick > > >