Re: IANA Considerations Re: LC model draft draft-ietf-forces-model-07.txt

Whoops; I meant RFC4114, E.164 Number Mapping for the Extensible Provisioning
Protocol, (not RFC4144), which gives an example of IANA considerations for the
two urn: for an XML namespace and schema.

My thanks to those who pointed this out to me off-list.

Tom Petch


----- Original Message -----
From: "tom.petch" <[email protected]>
To: "Patrick Droz" <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, October 30, 2006 5:51 PM
Subject: IANA Considerations Re: LC model draft draft-ietf-forces-model-07.txt


> I just came across a source of inspiration for a form of words for the XML
> namespace in the IANA Considerations.  I commend to you s6 of RFC4144.
>
> Tom Petch
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Patrick Droz" <[email protected]>
> To: <[email protected]>
> Sent: Friday, October 13, 2006 9:36 AM
> Subject: LC model draft draft-ietf-forces-model-07.txt
>
>
> > I would like to issue last call on the model draft. As this is
> > a fairly large document the LC will last for 3 weeks and will
> > therefore end just before the next IETF. It is draft:
> > draft-ietf-forces-model-07.txt
> > and can be found at:
> > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-forces-model-07.txt
> >
> > A number of people have indicated that if the document is in
> > LC they would thoroughly review the document. I hope people will
> > stick to their promises.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Patrick
> >
> >
> >
>