Re: terminology wa Re: XML basics Re: LC model draft draft-ietf-forces-model-07.txt

What Joel thinks about the naming of the components of the LFB 
Classes and structures is:
It is going to be awkward to fix
But keeping it as is would produce far more confusion for far more 
people over the long term.

So we seem to need to change the terms (element and attribute 
referring components of the structures / LFB Classes.)
Note that such a change will likely also affect the protocol 
document, since it talks about these things as well.

After that, I am willing to change them to almost anything.  (But I 
doubt it would help to declare that LFB Classes and structs have 
Foos, and some Foos are also Bars.  So better words are sought. I 
believe I have one suggestion on file, but would love to see actual 
discussion and input from other participants.)

Yours,
Joel

At 03:24 PM 10/31/2006, Jamal Hadi Salim wrote:
>What does Joel think about this?