Fw: TML Service Primitive Update
"Wang,Weiming" <[email protected]> Wed, 8 Nov 2006 00:33:25 +0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.forces,gmane.spam.detected |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <015e01c7028a$732c3d50$6401a8c0@WangHome> |
hehe, just let guys see what our dear INTERNET sometimes is! :) Weiming ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jamal Hadi Salim" <[email protected]> To: "Wang,Weiming" <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2006 12:15 AM Subject: Re: TML Service Primitive Update > Weiming, > > This is very very strange. Maybe i should stop using my companys email > services. My version of events below: > > On Wed, 2006-08-11 at 00:06 +0800, Wang,Weiming wrote: > > Jamal, > > > > I think we have really got problems with the email. I can describe > > the whole process as here: > > 1. You asked to change the text, I immediately reply that's ok. > > Did not receive this email. > > > 2. You sent an email ask why I did not reply, I replied again. > > This was the last email I received from you. > > Did not receive this. > > > 3. I asked you to reply me. With no reply. > > Refer to #2 above ;-> > > > 4. I waited for 3 days, asked again. no reply. I sent a sepcial > > email only to you (others are also for Alex) to ask if anything > > has made you unhappy. If so, pls let me know. > > didnt receive it either. > > > 5. 2-3 days before the meeting, I asked again about the progress, > > but still with no reply. > > didnt receive it either. > > > 6. Therefore, I sent you email to tell to take the editing and > > to incorparate the changes you proposed. Because it was very > > hurry that time, I did not use xml to do the changes. Note that > > there are still many things missed in your version of xml. All > > headings about SP parameters are missing. > > Also didnt see this either. > > > 7. I posted the changed update to the list. > > > > This i saw. And i can double check this information in case i dont > receive emails because it is archived on the internet. > > > That's all the process. > > But don't worry too much that we still are able to do anything that we > > can do. I'm really very glad to see that it was just a communication > > problem and see we can work together again:) > > > > A very bad communication problem. I thought you were too busy and > therefore were not responding to me. > > > pls reply to me immediately when you get the email. We still havn't > > verify the path from my place to yours. > > > > So it seems you were receiving my emails but i wasnt receiving yours. > > If you have the original emails or headers (which will have dates please > send them to me and I will follow up with our IT) > > cheers, > jamal >