Re: [Model] section 3.2.5

On Thu, 2006-28-12 at 13:57 -0500, Joel M. Halpern wrote:
> Almost.
> We need some word other than "element", since that is an XML term.
> But yes, we need a little text that talks about the commonality of 
> structure of LFB attributes, LFB capabilities, and Structure components.
> 

Shall i leave this in your able hands then?

cheers,
jamal

> Yours,
> Joel
> 
> At 11:40 AM 12/28/2006, Jamal Hadi Salim wrote:
> 
> >Sequentially going over the draft ...
> >
> >and as before, if theres some consensus i will put this in the tracker.
> >
> >Summary: this is also a readability issue:
> >
> >Section 3.2.5 references Elements in order to talk about their
> >properties.
> >Since "Elements" are such a central concept in LFB modelling, I think it
> >would make a lot of sense to have a short subsection on LFB Elements
> >(derived from the first paragraph) with proper reference for more
> >details (currently described as "elsewhere") followed by a subsection on
> >Element properties.
> >
> >cheers,
> >jamal