Re: [MODEL] Resolutions to nouns describing LFB class definitions?

Jamal Hadi Salim <[email protected]> Mon, 8 Jan 2007 11:14:55 -0500
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.forces
Organization ZNYX Networks
Message-ID <1168272895.5216.30.camel@jzny2>
folks,

Can we discuss this and resolve it? It is a little more difficult for me
to read 4.5.3 (and i am gonna assume the rest of 4.5.x).

Joel, what are your thoughts on the subject?

cheers,
jamal

On Fri, 2007-05-01 at 11:06 -0500, Jamal Hadi Salim wrote:
> Thanks Tom. I know Joel has it under control but i've just put this
> discussion in the tracker (issue #103) so it is not forgotten when
> people get busyed out.
> 
> cheers,
> jamal
> 
> On Fri, 2007-05-01 at 08:57 +0100, tom.petch wrote:
> > Jamal
> > 
> > There was general agreement that using the same terms as had technical meaning
> > in XML was likely to cause confusion but there was no consensus on what to
> > replace the ones in -model with.
> >