Re: [MODEL] Resolutions to nouns describing LFB class definitions?
Jamal Hadi Salim <[email protected]> Mon, 8 Jan 2007 11:14:55 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.forces |
|---|---|
| Organization | ZNYX Networks |
| Message-ID | <1168272895.5216.30.camel@jzny2> |
folks, Can we discuss this and resolve it? It is a little more difficult for me to read 4.5.3 (and i am gonna assume the rest of 4.5.x). Joel, what are your thoughts on the subject? cheers, jamal On Fri, 2007-05-01 at 11:06 -0500, Jamal Hadi Salim wrote: > Thanks Tom. I know Joel has it under control but i've just put this > discussion in the tracker (issue #103) so it is not forgotten when > people get busyed out. > > cheers, > jamal > > On Fri, 2007-05-01 at 08:57 +0100, tom.petch wrote: > > Jamal > > > > There was general agreement that using the same terms as had technical meaning > > in XML was likely to cause confusion but there was no consensus on what to > > replace the ones in -model with. > >