Re: [Model] Section 4.5.3

Actually, the example you quote is one wehre we actually were using 
the XML terrminology correctly and appropriately.

At 10:40 AM 1/23/2007, Jamal Hadi Salim wrote:
>- Everything that reads "attribute" in this section implies "property";
>so that lingering lingo issue is still distracting.
>[Example:
>"The array can be "fixed-size" or "variable-size", which is specified
>  by the "type" attribute of the <array> element. The default is
>  "variable-size".  For variable size arrays, an optional "max-length"
>  attribute specifies the maximum allowed length. This attribute
>  should be used to encode semantic limitations, not implementation
>  limitations. The latter should be handled by capability attributes .."
>]

These pieces of information are provided in the class definition, as 
XML attributes on the "arry" XML element.
The only exception is the implementation specific maximum size, which 
is now a property rather than a capability attribute.

Yours,
Joel