Re: [Fwd: RE: LC: draft-ietf-forces-protocol-10.txt>>ForCES message size?]
"Joel M. Halpern" <[email protected]> Thu, 14 Jun 2007 10:14:53 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.forces |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
That is the one case where the FE is reporting something without knowing the CE is interested. That was a base design decision. (We could have instead picked a specific set of information to report. Or no information at all could have been allowed.) If we want to tighten it up, a length limit is not the way to get at the issue. We would have to decide that we knew well enough what the CE needed to get, and mandate that. Yours, Joel At 02:45 AM 6/14/2007, Jia Fenggen wrote: >For association setup message,FE can unsolicited report some of its >LFB attributes to the CE,what the CE handles if the FE send it an >arbitrary association message,it's may bring problem to the CE? >Yours,Fenggen