Re: ForCES TLV size

Weiming,

So if i heard you right - you would rather see no solution more of a
textual explanation, yes?

The solution is implementable - i went over our code and did not see any
issues with parsing. 

cheers,
jamal

On Mon, 2007-20-08 at 00:00 +0800, Wang,Weiming wrote:
> Jamal， 
> 
> By providing a flag to extend the meaning of flags in one TLV over 
> to other TLVs is not a good solution. I'm not sure if you'v considered 
> carefully enough that this method does not induce possible parsing 
> problem for TLVs? I'm just worried that the Path-Data structure has 
> already been a complex body where even path-data TLV can be nested. 
> 
> Fenggen is in my implementation team．I think this solution is not we 
> expected when Fenggen raised this question. If anyone has ever been 
> doing the implementation completely, I'm afraid he will never be happy 
> with such design.
> 
> Comparatively, we can more live with no change.
> 
> thanks,
> Weiming
>