Re: Model terminology issue

hi,

you did not ask, but i can make the changes to the protocol draft.

btw,  what are we changing them to?

a.

On 23 aug 2007, at 07.02, Patrick Droz wrote:

> here is an extract of the minutes from the last IETF:
>
> On the model draft the main issue is the use of the term element and
> attributes. The problem is that these terms have meanings in XML. We
> should not overload these terms. The input came from Tom Petch on the
> mailing list. So we think we have to change all the references to both
> of these components. This will also require some fixes to the protocol
> draft. It is up to the chairs to make the call on that one. Both of  
> the
> drafts are supposed to be done in the very near future.
>
> As the active chair I ask this change to be made in order not to  
> get in trouble with XML experts. Joel would you mind doing it?
>
> Thanks,
> Patrick
>
> -- 
>   Dr. Patrick Droz                  | [email protected]
>   IBM Zurich Research Laboratory    | http://www.zurich.ibm.com/~dro
>   Saumerstrasse 4                   | Tel. +41-44-724-85-25
>   CH-8803 Rueschlikon/Switzerland   | Fax. +41-44-724-85-78