Re: Model terminology issue

Joel,

If you need any help on the text work that we may help, please just let us know. 

thanks,
Weiming

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Joel M. Halpern" <[email protected]>

> The basic change is to refer to the pieces as components.  I have to 
> go through the document and see how many variations on that term I need.
> I will send an email to the list with the exact terms.  I will get 
> this done by this weekend.
> 
> Joel
> 
> At 05:31 PM 8/23/2007, Avri Doria wrote:
> >hi,
> >
> >you did not ask, but i can make the changes to the protocol draft.
> >
> >btw,  what are we changing them to?
> >
> >a.
> >
> >On 23 aug 2007, at 07.02, Patrick Droz wrote:
> >
> >>here is an extract of the minutes from the last IETF:
> >>
> >>On the model draft the main issue is the use of the term element and
> >>attributes. The problem is that these terms have meanings in XML. We
> >>should not overload these terms. The input came from Tom Petch on the
> >>mailing list. So we think we have to change all the references to both
> >>of these components. This will also require some fixes to the protocol
> >>draft. It is up to the chairs to make the call on that one. Both of
> >>the
> >>drafts are supposed to be done in the very near future.
> >>
> >>As the active chair I ask this change to be made in order not to
> >>get in trouble with XML experts. Joel would you mind doing it?
> >>
> >>Thanks,
> >>Patrick
> >>
> >>--
> >>   Dr. Patrick Droz                  | [email protected]
> >>   IBM Zurich Research Laboratory    | http://www.zurich.ibm.com/~dro
> >>   Saumerstrasse 4                   | Tel. +41-44-724-85-25
> >>   CH-8803 Rueschlikon/Switzerland   | Fax. +41-44-724-85-78