Re: ForCES Protocol Implementation Issues
"SUBSCRIBE FORCES B. J. Kang" <[email protected]> Thu, 13 Sep 2007 02:59:15 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.forces |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <LISTSERV%[email protected]> |
On Thu, 13 Sep 2007 02:04:42 -0400, Joel M. Halpern <[email protected]> wrote: >For every table (array) in a Forces Object there is a properties >object (accessible via the protocol) which includes the first free >table entry, as well as the last used table entry. So the >information the CE needs is always available. >In fact, since the CE generally created the table, and created the >entries, it is anticipated that the CE will normally have a mirror >copy with any annotation information it wants, obviating the need to >query these fields. > What you mean is that I can get the information about which row is free without getting all the contents of a table to find the index of free rows? Because I try to implement Failover, I can not think that Backup CEs have the mirror copy of all FEs. Thanks a lot >Yours, >Joel M. Halpern > >At 12:50 AM 9/13/2007, B. J. Kang wrote: >>If I want to add a new route, I must to know which row is free. This >>is a funny >>thing. With MySql, I can only assign the data and don't care about which >>entry is free. Using the ForCES Protocol, operations with tables may be a >>difficult thing? I think it is unreasonable, isn't it?