Re: ForCES Protocol Implementation Issues
"SUBSCRIBE FORCES B. J. Kang" <[email protected]> Sun, 16 Sep 2007 22:28:49 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.forces |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <LISTSERV%[email protected]> |
On Thu, 13 Sep 2007 10:42:30 -0400, Jamal Hadi Salim <[email protected]> wrote: >On Thu, 2007-13-09 at 00:50 -0400, B. J. Kang wrote: > >> >If you want to reset the contents of a table, >> >simply make the table (not an element of the >> >table, but the table itself) the target of a SET >> >operation, and provide the contents you want to >> >set it to (including a 0 length content, which will create an empty table.) >> > >> >> Thanks for your answer. But it is a normal solution, or a trick? > >No, it is not a trick - rather design intent. >If you look at the examples, you will see some that dump the whole table >with GET operation. Likewise a table flush/delete will be of the same >nature with the appropriate operation. The path points to the object, >the operation says what to do. >Do you think we need to be explicit on this issue? > So if I have a table and IDs is 1.3, I can use DEL opeation with IDs = 1.3 and FULLDATA TLV = 4(only T+L, no Value) to kill all content of the table? In the article "Draft Protocol", it defines a lot of return code of Result TLV. But I have some confusion. Like "0x01 E_INVALID_HEADER", if I parse a packet and its common header is incorrect, where can I put the Rusult TLV to report the error? Thanks a lot. >cheers, >jamal