Ftp-WG: status of rfc 2228
Jeffrey Altman <[email protected]> Tue, 4 Nov 2003 08:39:27 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.ftpext |
|---|---|
| Organization | Columbia University in the City of New York |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
[email protected] wrote: >hello all, > >i'm new to the list. > >very recently, i've taken an interest in the status of rfc 2228 as i wish to implement some means of user authentication, integrity protection, and optional data encryptiong to an existing ftpd implementation. > >i was wondering if anyone knew which ftp implementations currently support the proposed security extensions. > > There are many implementations supporting GSSAPI-Kerberos 5 Kerberos 4 Secure Remote Password Transport Layer Security v1 Kermit <http://www.kermit-project.org/> is a FTP client which supports all of the above. We have a partial list of servers at <http://www.kermit-project.org/ftpd.html> >and finally, are there any thoughts on combining the control connection and data connection? in my eyes, this would eliminate the bounce attack and make ftp less of a problem for nat'd connections and firewalls. > > If you want a secure file transfer solution which requires only a single channel, then you want RFC 2839, Internet Kermit Service. <ftp://ftp.isi.edu/in-notes/rfc2839.txt> and <http://www.kermit-project.org/iksd.html> >thanks for any feedback > > >abe > >
smime.p7s
(application/x-pkcs7-signature, 3.3 KB) - not displayed