Ftp-WG: status of rfc 2228

Well, our track record of getting the AD's to do anything is not
great. The MLST proposal which is what started this group anyway
about 7 years ago still has not made it to draft. I've submitted
it several times.

As far as 2228, it was handled by the security working group
I believe. It certainly was not handled through this one. I would
think that group should try and advance it.

Paul

--------------------

Paul Hethmon
Project Manager
Marketlinx Solutions
865.777.0088 (work)
865.777.1188 (fax)
865.218.3629 (desk)
865.250.3517 (cell) 


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jeffrey Altman [mailto:[email protected]] 
> Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 12:48 PM
> To: FTPEXT Working Group
> Subject: Ftp-WG: status of rfc 2228
> 
> 
> The fastest way would be for the Working Group Chair to agree 
> there is 
> WG consensus
> for the draft to be a product of the working group, and then 
> for there 
> to be a
> WG Last Call issued.
> 
> As a product of a working group, the draft would be required to be 
> processed in
> a timely manner by the Area Directors responsible for the 
> working group.
> 
> - Jeff
> 
> 
> TJ Saunders wrote:
> 
> >jaltma>Because it was never adopted by the FTP-WG as a working
> >jaltma>group item and the former Security AD who was supposed to
> >jaltma>handle the Last Call work never found the time AND is no
> >jaltma>longer an AD.
> >
> >Given the above, what can be done, going forward, to promote 
> the Draft to
> >a full RFC?
> >
> >Cheers,
> >TJ
> >
> >~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> >
> >   Are you not ashamed of your eagerness to possess as much 
> wealth, reputation
> >   and honors as possible while you do not care for nor give 
> thought to wisdom
> >   or truth, or the best possible state of your soul?
> >
> >     -Socrates
> >
> >~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> >
> >  
> >
>