Ftp-WG: status of rfc 2228

"Paul Hethmon" <[email protected]> Tue, 4 Nov 2003 15:00:34 -0500
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.ftpext
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Right, I realize that. I was saying that that draft was the
product of another working group, evidently the Network Working
Group (according to the RFC). I remember it coming up for 
discussion in our group briefly when it was submitted for
proposed standard. By then the work was complete in the other
group.

That said, I don't mind submitting it from this group to
advance it, if their is consensus. Someone should contact the
authors and see if there are any revisions which should be 
made. The same question should go to any implementors.

Paul

--------------------

Paul Hethmon
Project Manager
Marketlinx Solutions
865.777.0088 (work)
865.777.1188 (fax)
865.218.3629 (desk)
865.250.3517 (cell) 


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jeffrey Altman [mailto:[email protected]] 
> Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 2:49 PM
> To: FTPEXT Working Group
> Subject: Ftp-WG: status of rfc 2228
> 
> 
> Paul:
> 
> There is no "FTP Security" Working Group.  The only FTP 
> related working
> group is the FTP Extensions" Working Group.
> 
> - Jeff
> 
> 
> Paul Hethmon wrote:
> 
> >Well, our track record of getting the AD's to do anything is not
> >great. The MLST proposal which is what started this group anyway
> >about 7 years ago still has not made it to draft. I've submitted
> >it several times.
> >
> >As far as 2228, it was handled by the security working group
> >I believe. It certainly was not handled through this one. I would
> >think that group should try and advance it.
> >
> >Paul
> >
> >--------------------
> >
> >Paul Hethmon
> >Project Manager
> >Marketlinx Solutions
> >865.777.0088 (work)
> >865.777.1188 (fax)
> >865.218.3629 (desk)
> >865.250.3517 (cell) 
> >
> >  
> >
>